Elimination of the subject in the texts of the ancient Egyptian language (intermediate stage)

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assistant teacher at the Faculty of Archeology in Qena

Abstract

delete
It is a term used in linguistics to refer to the absence of a specific linguistic unit in the sentence in which it is understood
From the context, and according to Schenkel’s opinion, Elimination: It is the non-repetition of the additions that are attached to the core of the sentence if
The sentence is compound and contains more than one sub-sentence. And Mahmoud Al-Ham said that the deletion appears in
The first position of the dependent sentence, provided that it does not affect it from the grammatical point of view, and there is a relationship between the sentence
Which contains the deletion and the previous sentence in terms of meaning. Borchot sees it as reducing the additions that
Appended in bulk provided that it does not affect the integrity of the subject, as is known for example the omission of the introductory article
iw, and through this, the researcher sees that deletion is the omission of any element of the sentence, either for the purpose of brevity
In speech if the meaning is clear and implicitly understood, and therefore there is no need to mention the omitted element, or for necessity
We note that omission is of two types: obligatory omission: which, in the case of linguistic necessity, may be
For the purpose of constructing the unknown, ordering, requesting, or wishing. Permissible omission: It is for the purpose of brevity in speech when
The meaning is clear and understood implicitly, and therefore there is no need to mention it, as the element may be deleted or not. be delete
In the ancient Egyptian language, usually in compound sentences that contain more than one sub-clause, where the
At least there is one or more main clauses, and the main clause expresses the main event and may be accompanied by subordinate main clauses
These sentences are often linked in the Arabic language by the conjunction (and), but in the ancient Egyptian language
These sentences are listed successively without a linking tool, where the linking of the sentences understands each other through the sentence relationship
The sentence preceding it, and when there is a common part between these sentences is often omitted and is implied by
During the context of speech where it represents the same thing in the previous sentence and therefore there is no need to repeat it again. This part may be an introductory tool used to open the speech, so there is no need to repeat it in the middle of the speech or a predicate
In the case of the nominative sentence, it can also be a subject or object in the phrasal verb, and this is what the research will include
Through the main element in the sentence structure, which is the subject, as it was deleted in many texts and there are many
Its positions and causes in the ancient Egyptian language through literary and religious texts in the Middle Ages
(2140 BC to 1360 BC).

Keywords